Quote:
Originally Posted by Rex
Wow talk about psychedelic colour pallette. This is really awesome Andy. Very artistic indeed.
|
Thanks Rex, sometimes pushing the accepted boundaries of what we are used to seeing can send us into a zone of acceptance of the new. Unfortunately in this case the technical side didn't match up to the artistic on close inspection.
Appreciate your positive feedback though
Quote:
Originally Posted by h0ughy
i cant throw any stones in this glasshouse, never done a narrow band image before but it is funky and different. only the guys who have the ability to process this stuff would pick the faults. for me it is very energetic, hard to view - there is just so much there.
|
Thanks Houghy, I felt the same after seeing a recent doco on contemporary Australian art. Some of those paintings are disturbing, difficult for my brain to process and as you say, very energetic. But boundaries are there to be pushed so as I/we strive for that ultimate goal of perfection (or at least very good) in this technical art form there will be always be some missteps and false starts on the journey. Probably where this one sits as is. Appreciate the feedback as always
Quote:
Originally Posted by RickS
I quite like the colours, Andy. Probably better than in the vanilla Hubble version you just posted 
|
Well thanks Rick! It's hard to please everyone and I sort of agree completely. That drama/technical balance/impact & aesthetically pleasing formula is hard to crack. 'Twas pleasing to get closer to a technically correct image today in the 'vanilla' version but I struggled to push the data to the previous level without it breaking up.
Probably need to get mega data like Slawomir's recent & amazing Cat's paw to achieve that balance. Thanks for the sentiment though