View Single Post
  #28  
Old 25-08-2015, 01:40 PM
RobC (Rob)
Registered User

RobC is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Woodford , Queensland , Australia
Posts: 219
Quote:
Originally Posted by strongmanmike View Post
Well, I actually said "manufacture pseudo detail" which is not quite the same and Rod just showed us exactly how he used PI to manufacture this pseudo detail ...and it always imparts the same tell-tale "look" to details that is easy to spot.. I could be wrong but I recon Rod would be very happy to remove the RA backlash and like us all, place his scope under arc sec seeing, so the detail would be raw and not need as much enhancement by complex but imperfect algorithms that approximate the real detail.

None of this makes it a bad image, it is just easy going processing small talk

Mike
Mike,

I really don't know what you are on about trying to discredit PI's deconvolution procedures. There are many schools of image enhancement. You have yours , and there are many others. None has the insight to know how an object should appear so there are many interpretations. To imply one interpretation is false is nonsense.

Cheers

Rob
Reply With Quote