[Slawomir (Suavi)]

Originally Posted by Regulus

What Paul said :-)
And I'll add: excellent apparent depth

Trev

Thank you Trevor!

Originally Posted by rat156

Hi Paul,

Whilst I agree with the sentiment of your post, I have to go all English Nazi on you and point out that nothing is "fairly unique", it's either unique, or not. Having said that, aren't all of the images here unique?

Cheers
Stuart

Please do not pick on me...

Originally Posted by Atmos

That is a very nicely looking Paw, like a cat has run over some hot coals

Thank you Colin, I am glad you like the colours.

Originally Posted by multiweb

The high res is superb. Awesome details. Looks very fiery like an explosion. Top shot.

Thank you Marc. Took some time to get there (11 evening sessions)

Originally Posted by gregbradley

That's an interesting post Slawomir. So the bulk of the noise drop is done by the first 0 or 5 subs and then its a much slower rate of improvement and by the time you've done 50 you are not going to see much better by doing more at increasingly more work and time.

I wonder what optimum is then between weather, setup speed, work, object location, equipment foibles.

8 to 20 hours on a faster system and 20-30 for a slower system? Depending on the object's brightness and whether its LRGB or narrowband.

Greg.

Agreed. There are many variables affecting the final image, so it might just serve as a rough guide. I think if one is after really faint detail, then perhaps every good sub would count. But it looks like for my setup and in my location and with my current skills, going over 25 hours with 3nm filters would be an overkill for majority of targets.