Quote:
Originally Posted by rustigsmed
hi kristoff,
feel free to add a drop box link of the actual original raw and unaltered file ... till then nothing can be added to what has generously been said.
i suspect there is nothing wrong with the equipment but its application and that is something we may be able to help you with - more details to that effect would aid in achieving this.
regards
|
Ha .... so far no one was talking about seeing. I thing this is most likely suspect.
Should you have Pix-Insight software and willing to analyze images you may find more likable answers. I used only uraf .... may be buying one day Pix_Insight but with sky quality in Sydeny it is rather pointless.
Ok there are links to RAW imaging.
https://goo.gl/photos/dHZsi836MrWTC7Ux5
https://goo.gl/photos/GssK3dK5HHjW6CoY7
https://goo.gl/photos/bjGwuJRHPHWc3dQf8
And one image giving an idea about my optical instruments .... pretty good.
https://goo.gl/photos/dsQneEbTEKKbYqX5A
naturally one needs to consider seeing at time of observation. Sydney is almost constantly in "earth quake" see geophysical survey for area .... amplitue much higher than photons vibration amplitude and 0,4 arc.sec optics resolution, largely ignored by amateur astronomers.
Thanks for trying to have professional look at my query.
Kris