View Single Post
  #9  
Old 28-05-2006, 10:42 AM
[1ponders]'s Avatar
[1ponders] (Paul)
Retired, damn no pension

[1ponders] is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Obi Obi, Qld
Posts: 18,778
Ok I'll give it a go.

I don't think the resizing helped your image quality Lester, Still looks good, but decidedly less appealing than the first set. That's not saying that any planetary scientist wouldn't have given his left ......... big toe for images like that a very short time ago.

Seeing of course plays a big part in this so unless you are going to take comparison shots at the same time, same place, same image scale, etc it isn't going to be a valid comparison. But for taking the effort and trying even a subjective comparison.

Order of preference.
1. Lesters small images 10 fps then 5 fps - sharper images
2. Asi's images 5 fps then 10 fps (I'd say seeing stuffed you on the second Asi) - more detail visible
3. Resized - Better size but the detail is smeared out, for me.
Reply With Quote