View Single Post
  #11  
Old 16-07-2015, 09:40 AM
Peter.M's Avatar
Peter.M
Registered User

Peter.M is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 970
Quote:
Originally Posted by julianh72 View Post
The last two comparison images at the bottom of the page http://www.stanmooreastro.com/f_ratio_myth.htm are very misleading. If one was indeed taken at f/12.4 and the other at f/3.9, then they have been scaled differently, or were taken with different sized sensors. For example, if the f/12.4 image is the full capture over the sensor, then the f/3.9 image is roughly a 1/3 x 1/3 crop of the whole image. (Either that, or the sensor used for the f/3.9 image is only 1/3 the size of the f/12.4 image sensor.)

Using a focal reducer on a long focal length telescope lets you capture a bigger sky area on the same sensor, but doesn't alter the brightness of the image which is captured.
You are wrong. It does alter the brightness of extended sources. Because now at a lower sampling rate more area of sky fits into each pixel
Reply With Quote