View Single Post
  #18  
Old 15-05-2015, 08:32 PM
deanm (Dean)
Registered User

deanm is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 818
Folks: I find this fascinating - and it clearly involves considerable effort.

I'm a scientist, and (like you), we like to measure things.

Repeated or replicate measurements afford statistical analysis ( and confidence intervals).

Correct me if I'm wrong (which my wife tells me I always am!), but you seem to be making astrometric measurements at around 1 second intervals.

Is it possible to up this rate by (say) 5-10 fold. That way, instead of individual points apparently indicative of rings, you would have significantly more measurements over event times.

I understand that this would generate 5-10 times the amount of data - but digital storage is super cheap nowadays - and (for an authentic ring occultation) you would see 5-10 points on your time (aka frame number) versus flux graphs.

So doing would also greatly enhance spatial/chronological resolution of these occultation events.

Surely you generally use video-format type data capture (which clicks along faster than that: 30 fps is considered 'low-end', apparently).

Can your software handle such?

Dean
Reply With Quote