Quote:
Originally Posted by cometcatcher
That's quite stunning!
|
Thanks Kevin, glad you like it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by gregbradley
Lots of detail and very dramatic. Nicely done.
Greg.
|
Cheers Greg, I've been enjoying your posts lately re- the AP-RH, very envious of your latest acquisition. I wish they were as easy to get as a nice Tak.
Quote:
Originally Posted by kkara4
just astounding. Excellent image 
|
Thanks Krishan
Quote:
Originally Posted by RickS
Nice narrowband colour and composition, Chris.
I'm about to drop back from 2760mm to 800mm focal length for a while and I expect I'll find it a lot less stressful
Cheers,
Rick.
|
Thanks Rick, I've been loving your work of late, the compliment is much appreciated.
I do like imaging at longer focal length but with the 8300 it is not ideal. I just can't justify dropping a large sum of $$ into a new image train with out-dated and old tech sensors. Current large sensor setups seem somewhat in a limbo.
Quote:
Originally Posted by graham.hobart
I really like this processing, does look flame like.
Thanks for showing
Graz
|
Thanks Graz
Quote:
Originally Posted by strongmanmike
Great framing not seen that often and yes does look flame like, quite a bit of movement in there too...different, nice work
Mike
|
Thanks Mike
Quote:
Originally Posted by chuckywiz
awesome picture there.. makes me drool as it smashed anything my little dslr can do on that target... now dreams of affording a ccd one day.
|
Thanks Ben, CCD's are a good way to go, perhaps CMOS too in the near future, which could be more affordable?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Placidus
Hi, Chris,
I really like the composition, depth, and clarity, and especially the treatment of the nebulosity toward lower left. There are bits of the cat's paw that have a similar "roast chicken" texture. Goes with the flames, perhaps.
Astrophysically, I wonder if that vaguely honeycombed effect is due to two overlapping sets of multiple shock fronts at slightly different distances, and slightly different orientations.
Best,
Mike
|
Thanks Mike,
Yes, there is a lot of movement visible. I guess there were various events triggering separate shock fronts which interact (like ripples in a pond, either amplifying or canceling out?, i.e wave motion?), in addition to differing densities reacting differently too. It is cool to observe it at this scale.