View Single Post
  #9  
Old 01-05-2015, 12:07 PM
jsmoraes's Avatar
jsmoraes (Jorge)
Registered User

jsmoraes is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Saquarema, RJ , Brazil
Posts: 1,102
Well, trying Moon with Focal Extender 3x. The result wasn't good. I have some photos of Moon with Canon T3, not movie, and they are better.

Perhaps I am having problems with adaptation 1.25" to 2". Focus seems to be another issue. Maybe the seeing didn't help, also.

Actually, I think that for planetary... my Canon 1100D will not work so good as my ASI. Take a look at http://astronomia-e-astrofotos.10697...SI-td1985.html . Astonish and impressive images !
I can not publish here because the files are very large. More than 200 kb of IIS.

Conclusion of my test: I can use my Canon for planetary, and it will give me some medium quality images. I already did some tests before. I found the images in my site. They are not done with ressource 5x. http://astronomia-e-astrofotos.10697...T3-td1552.html

The End !
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (moon_1-80s_800iso_848x568_150428-18h14m18s.jpg)
99.2 KB41 views
Click for full-size image (moon-Canon-150428.jpg)
145.5 KB32 views
Click for full-size image (LuaCanon-iso400-1-50s.jpg)
103.8 KB32 views
Reply With Quote