View Single Post
  #15  
Old 17-04-2015, 01:03 AM
cometcatcher's Avatar
cometcatcher (Kevin)
<--- Comet Hale-Bopp

cometcatcher is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Cloudy Mackay
Posts: 6,542
I have a similar achro to Rick and Barry, a Sky Watcher 120mm F5. You can kind of get away with it better on some objects than others. A nebula filter will reduce a lot of CA, as with the eta pic here. But M42 (no filter) is horrible.

Does it have to be a refractor? Small reflectors are very cheap even brand new these days. They offer a big bang for your buck. On the down side they need collimation and a coma corrector for photography. But they've won me over. APO refractors are too expensive for me. I have an ED100 (which is great) but a bit slow compared to the Newtonians.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (47_tuc.jpg)
90.5 KB40 views
Click for full-size image (eta_cls.jpg)
179.8 KB40 views
Click for full-size image (m45.jpg)
97.8 KB36 views
Click for full-size image (m46.jpg)
131.8 KB32 views
Click for full-size image (mimosa.jpg)
81.5 KB34 views
Click for full-size image (M42.jpg)
191.1 KB43 views
Reply With Quote