Quote:
Originally Posted by strongmanmike
Looks like the tune up worked Greg  ... looking at the bright stars it looks like they have been worked on to make'em smaller, what did you do to the stars? Decon? Did you apply star shrinking to the fainter stars too? Only ask out of interest because they look good regardless, nice work  I thought you were having star bloat problems with the 684? There are some mixed gradients in the back ground but the lovely soft look works and the faint outer arms are there...but I'm thinking there is more detail in there somewhere though..? Or do you think you have reached the seeing limit on this occasion?
Hope that didn't sound like a nit pick list  it's a really nice image, just musing out loud
Mike |
Yes I did some work on the stars. I am surprised there are still some gradients as I couldn't see anymore but different monitors probably show up things. More detail is very likely able to be achieved with more exposure. I was happy to get a decent image out of less than 4 hours of data.
Greg.