Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Haese
A huge image, lots to look at and with good colour Mike. Detail is good too, though I found this object a really tough customer. I think from memory I did 9.3 hours with an 8" and found it very noisy and still lacking detail. So by comparison your image is a masterly effort and very good already.
Just some minor issues. Your calibration frames might want checking as I can see coloured pixels in various spots. I have found this often happens when my darks are getting to around 5 months old. So maybe it might pay to check those.
Double your current exposure time is bound to achieve great results and I am looking forward to an even greater image.
|
Thanks hugely, Paul. You are right about the darks. They are getting a bit stale. Even worse is some quite strange behaviour by either the 16803 chip or the way Apogee handles it. Each frame seems to have a dozen or so quite faint quasi-stellar bright spots. Not after-images (residual or ghost), not hot pixels, but something with an FWHM of about 2.5 pixels. But they are random. In the next shot, they will be somewhere else. I try to find them by automatically searching for spots that are only in one channel, and zapping them. New darks can only help, of course.
Quote:
Originally Posted by strongmanmike
Wow, great view of this pair Mike and Trish, a great target for your big beast of a scope and I love the vibrant colours too, who processed that bit..?
I see a lot of variation in the background, is that galactic cirrus? Even if it isn't it looks good anyway
Mike
|
Thanks muchly Mike! The colour was a team effort. Pretty sure that the background variation is just dodgy flats. Did a complete new set this afternoon!
Very best,
Mike n Trish