View Single Post
  #2  
Old 21-03-2015, 09:52 PM
Wavytone
Registered User

Wavytone is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Killara, Sydney
Posts: 4,147
Tony keep what you have and don't develop a case of Eyepiece Envy.

On an f/10 scope pretty much any good eyepiece will work fine, you aren't going to get anything significantly better by splurging on the latest super-ultra-maxi-wide from televue or Explore Scientific.

Quote:
Can you give me an idea if my ones are considered to be the ‘classic’ good ones or not?
Forget it. Whether they're "classic" is irrelevant - they're not collectible and don't appreciate in value. Astro gear - eyepieces included - depreciates faster than cars.

Quote:
I want to get good widefields at low and high magnifications, and I’d like to get good planet details.
No eyepiece does both.

Basically, the wider the field of view, the more glass elements internally and air-glass surfaces. This degrades transmission and contrast, contributes to light scatter, internal "ghosts", and on-axis performance is generally compromised to get good performance at extreme off-axis angles.

The best planetary views are generally had with relatively simple eyepieces with few elements - monocentrics, RKE, Plossl, orthoscopic etc. Buth these have a small field of view.


Quote:
I like the sound of the Ethos 21mm, 100 AFOV, but I live in the northern suburbs of Perth, Western Australia – there is some light pollution, and I am worried that a 100 degree field might just accentuate any skyglow and give a disappointing result.
you are right about that, actually. The usual result i your night vision is degraded and you don't see faint things so well as you might hope.

In suburbia there is a lot to be said for eyepieces with a modest field of view with a big black region outside the field stop - this maximises your night vision.

Quote:
Would a Delos be a better bet?
Not noticeably better than what you have.

Quote:
I’m 58
Your exit pupil might reach 5mm if you are lucky (I'm 57 and mine is 4mm).

Quote:
can a Meade 2080 8inch SCT give the full view in a 2 inch
No it cannot. The central hole in the backplate is considerably smaller than the inside barrel diameter of the big 2" eyepieces.

While you can try one it will vignette for sure.

FWIW I have a Skywatcher 7" 180mm f15 maksutov, this is the smallest cataleptic that comes with a 2" back, and it can fill the fields of the Vixen 42mm LVW and LV50mm - which are my preferred low power eyepieces.

On a Meade or Celstron f/10 SCT the smallest that can fill these eyepieces are the 10" (Meade) or the 9.25" (Celestron).

Last edited by Wavytone; 21-03-2015 at 10:07 PM.
Reply With Quote