Quote:
Originally Posted by Quark
Nicely done John, WinJUPOS has been a game changer, I generally stack 50% of my data, for Jupiter that gives me approx 7,000 frames per channel. It continues to amaze me how quite ordinary raw data can produce such unexpected results with this process.
|
Thanks Trev - did not realise that you stack such a high proportion of your frames. What time period do you use per channel?
Quote:
Originally Posted by MarkJ
Thanks John,
I am in Ivanhoe and I have a 12" F5 from Bintel. FWIW, image from around the same time as you here:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/...b15_1434UT.jpg
Taken 11th Feb 15 at 1:34 local time
Edmund filters, DMK21AU618, Powermate x5, Autostakkert
No WinJupos yet...
Best regards,
Mark |
Thanks Mark - did you ever get an IR685 filter? I think this is what is making all the difference for me.
Another image attached showing only 300 frames per AVI channel x 3 so 900 per channel plus Luminance from Feb 9th with the GRS and Io in transit.
I am starting to think that in variable conditions less may be more in that there are less good frames that can be captured.