Quote:
Originally Posted by RickS
Speaking for myself, that's not what I'm saying. Given the option I'll take good data any time and I'm prepared to work hard to get it. However, I think that weak data with good processing will usually produce a better result than good data with weak processing.
Cheers,
Rick.
|
No problems with that Rick. In my original post I was assuming a single competent processor and my original statement was simply stating that he/she would produce a better image with better data, reinforcing what Paul posted concerning noise. Sure if someone has eggy stars they can resort to star rounding in Photoshop but the final result they produce is never going to be as good as getting round stars in the first place.
Geoff