Quote:
Originally Posted by ghsmith45
Come on guys (Fred, Marc and Rick) are you really suggesting it doesn't matter how crappy your data is because you can hide all the crap with processing?
|
Speaking for myself, that's not what I'm saying. Given the option I'll take good data any time and I'm prepared to work hard to get it. However, I think that weak data with good processing will usually produce a better result than good data with weak processing.
To produce a great result you need both, of course, and that's what we're all aiming for. A really good image is the result of good data and every small aspect of your processing being just right. A few percent better here and a few more there and eventually you're talking a big difference.
Cheers,
Rick.