View Single Post
  #13  
Old 24-12-2014, 01:56 PM
Paul Haese's Avatar
Paul Haese
Registered User

Paul Haese is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 9,991
Quote:
Originally Posted by stevous67 View Post
I'm sorry to hear your camera has failed again Paul. I can understand your disillusionment.

I have also had a less than acceptable results with my STXL with it going back to the USA many times. In fact I did not get an image from it in the first six months of ownership. Even now the camera produces what I feel as less than comparable results to that of my STL [which I also bought new]. My STL produces with ease very smooth results, whereas the STXL requires serious effort to reach the same level.

This issue may not be directly a fault of the manufacture, but an issue with the CCD. Overall, the STXL is a beautiful piece of work, and all other components work well. My two remaining issues is that the main chip has very noticeable vertical banding, which I am told is normal for the CCD used. This is my main disappointment with the camera, as it is normally present in short exposures [very bad banding], to long exposures [where the banding is less noticeable]. I have a attached typical example of a 240sec bin 2x2 exposure [totally raw sub, no calibration].

The second is that the self guide chip has obstruction, that shouldn't be there.

With extra work, I get good results, but I still wonder if these were fixed, would my results be better? But the matter has been closed by SBIG.

Good luck Paul, you'll be noticed because of your profile.


Steve
Funnily enough I have seen exactly the same lines on my darks and light frames. It tends to be intermittent thing but it is real. I have attached a copy of one of my images which shows the problem. So you can use that as evidence this has been happening on a camera other than your own. It is not likely to be a specific thing in your observatory or mine. Most likely defective electronics.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (NGC7293 OIII 1800.00397 scaled.jpg)
47.4 KB36 views
Reply With Quote