Quote:
Originally Posted by Rod771
They look good Ray. Its always pleasing when new equipment behaves.
Cheers
Rod
|
thanks Rod. yep it isn't always the case that new gear behaves
Quote:
Originally Posted by RickS
A lovely pair of images, Ray. I spent a lot of time on NGC7424 at Astrofest year before last and it is a very dim and difficult target!
Cheers,
Rick.
|
thanks Rick. Agree, 7424 is quite dim - it was quite hard to get from this site (no longer as dark as it was)
Quote:
Originally Posted by rogerg
Wow, NGC1398 in particular is spectacular. Very nice images.
|
Thanks very much Roger for your generous comment.
Quote:
Originally Posted by strongmanmike
Another two excellent images Ray, 1398 is particularly lovely with its fine inner ring/arms and the overall feel of the image is very captivating and it has your classic hallmark clean punching above your weight look  I was going to shoot this galaxy myself actually but sheesh  there are sooo many options this time of year huh?  7424 is really good too but maybe lacks a bit of colour variation perhaps? (minor critique)
Like your work
Mike
|
Thank you Mike. I also like 1398, but it was initially a disappointment, since it was fairly dim and featureless. However, the data responded to some digging and the final result was worthwhile. It's like being in a lolly shop with so many galaxies to choose from.

I agree with your critique on 7424 - the background noise intrudes as well as the colour being a bit one dimensional.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Placidus
Agree that 1398 is especially fine. A beautiful galaxy and a beautiful image. And the background of 1398 is beautifully rich in little fellows showing form. Best, Mike
|
Thanks very much Mike. Yes I was amazed at how much background stuff showed up and the image was processed to bring them out.
Quote:
Originally Posted by tilbrook@rbe.ne
Great work again Ray! 
Ditto on 1398, the detail is amazing.
Cheers,
Justin.
|
G'day Justin. Thanks very much for the positive comments.
Regards Ray