Quote:
Originally Posted by Bassnut
Its a cracker Mike, your processing is as always appropriate IMO, striking and poppy, I cant see how you could better it with stuffing around with it.
|
Cheers Fred and yes you are probably right re reproing...but I'll have a tinker anyway but may not post it
Quote:
Originally Posted by astroron
Mike the core is mag 12.5 the star close by the SN is 13.5 and the Supernova was 14.5,now 15.2 so the chances of observing the Supernova visually were rather slim,needing a 20" IMHO to be certain of an observation.
When it was at it's brightest I couldn't split it with a 3.5 nagler magx522 in my 16" on a good night.
Cheers  |
Ahhh I see, the two stars just seemed brighter than that but reflecting now it does seem about right what you say
...seems imaging wins this time round
Quote:
Originally Posted by LewisM
|
Glad you like it Lewis and it is probably worthy of anyones top ten galaxies as far as imaging goes, not sure for visual though, I know NGC 1365 is hard to beat in that dept as its two distinct arms can even be seen by some novices through as little as 8" under dark skies
Mike