|
There is little chance the work will overturn mainstream science.
I could be wrong but I think Dr A Einstein himself rejected the notion of the existence of black holes and if so that is rather ironic considering it is his work which is relief upon to propose the existence of a black hole.
It seems the paper has not been peer reviewed so we have a problem there one would think.
That article suggests we can think of a black hole like a infinitely sense peanut which I think may be misleading. My humble layman understanding is that a black hole has no size and infinitely small and it only the size of the event horizon that we can attribute size by way of a finite diameter. I would appreciate if any members qualified to comment as to the reasonableness of that perception.
The possibility that there could not be a black hole may not exclude the prospect of a singularity prior to inflation so this news hardly posses a problem for big bang cosmology...I don't know that mainstream will see any merit in this work if there is no peer review.
Not being a scientist it is difficult for me to understand the ramifications but as a guess I don't think it will be taken seriously.
|