|
Hi Paul, I think the key comment of Robby's (as you point out below) on LR deconvolution is that it seems to deliver results even if it doesn't make sense why. I have little idea how or why any of the post-processing I use works, I just fiddle and see what delivers, and LR deconvolution delivers consistently improved results on most of my planetary avis. Not all mind you. I've found my best seeing avis are best straight from registax with a little soft-sharpening. Like DP the larger image scale shots seem to suffer too much noise with LR deconvolution with ME delivering better results. When I intend to run LR I still apply wavelets in Registax and export a BMP, but I take care not to push the wavelets too hard.
cheers,
|