View Single Post
  #7  
Old 28-08-2014, 02:02 PM
LewisM's Avatar
LewisM
Novichok test rabbit

LewisM is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Somewhere in the cosmos...
Posts: 10,389
Quote:
Originally Posted by PlanetMan View Post
I probably misread the article but it doesn't actually discuss fluorite in refractor optics - I thought the whole idea of fluorite particle lens (ie FPL 51 53) was to get the good benefits of fluorite crystal without the hiccups (fragile, brittle, expensive, toxic etc)
No, it wasn't specifically mentioned - just about the discovery of fluorine origins... which I branched off on. ANYWAY...

FPL53 only has roughly 20% (MAXIMUM) or fluorite in it, so it only proffers SOME of the good Fl characteristics. FPL53 still shows significantly more light scatter than a CaF2 element does. I haven't looked at O'Hara's site for a while, but I think FPL51 - the most common glass in Chinese refractors - only contains roughly 4 to 8% fluorite.

I found this iStar forum thread of interest: http://istarscopeclub.proboards.com/...-fluorite-apos

Well worth the read if you are interested in the differences between CaF2, FPL51 and FPL53 glasses.

Andrew - I make all my vodka shot glasses out of CaF2 - slamming them on the table or setting Ouzo alight is guaranteed to shatter them into non-reusable status
Reply With Quote