Quote:
Originally Posted by Renato1
Well that's interesting, but I'll add it to what it says is
"More than a dozen theories have now been proposed for the so-called global warming hiatus, ranging from air pollution to volcanoes to sunspots."
That makes it more than a dozen theories plus one, and quite a few of the previous ones claim to be definitive - and peer reviewed too.
Oddly enough the study seems to be using the term "deep sea" to refer to depths of 2000m where Argo measures to - but that's the upper ocean, not deep sea. I guess they may be saying that their studies show heat being funneled to the deep ocean below 2000m - but there aren't systemic measurements down there to prove it.
Cheers,
Renato
|
Thank you for your polite reply.
It does appear there are a few theories on this matter so I am not surprised you have noted them.
I seem to detect a hint of scepticism as to their reasonableness and indeed the peer review process
Unfortunately one must publish ones own theory and have it reviewed to supplant a theory. Until then one can't pass the level of sceptic and the sceptics hold the lower ground Still I do enjoy the discussions I witness here knowing at this level it is belief against belief with no prospect of victory for either side