|
I don't normally get involved in these things but I am going to take the bait. I think I would take the peer-reviewed work of the Bureau of Meteorology, which has generally taken a conservative view on climate analysis, against a single PhD (biology) who is a known sceptic of climate change and belongs to an "institution" (IPA) known for its cherry picking and deliberate misinterpretation of climate data, and one funded largely by oil, coal and gas companies. But having observed these types of posts by the OP, my comment will not make one iota of difference and is probably a complete waste of the 30 seconds it's taken me to write this.
|