View Single Post
  #17  
Old 16-08-2014, 09:30 AM
casstony
Registered User

casstony is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Warragul, Vic
Posts: 4,494
Quote:
Originally Posted by LewisM View Post
Not to be the harbinger of bad news, but WO FLT132 comes under quite a bit of harsh criticism, and doesn't hold up well under testing on the bench. .
While those tests show very bad optics, I think WO had a problem with their lens cells/spacing at the time and I imagine they would have got on top of it very quickly. An email to WO about the astro-foren samples would clear things up. I can't imagine many owners not noticing optics of such poor quality.
Reply With Quote