Most of the range of ES EPs seem to have the same specifications as now defunct ranges of Meade EPs. Are they really the same optical configerations redesigned in new exteriors, or are there more significant differences (besides appearing to cost less)? Any thoughts on this?
I have the Meade 4.7 & 6.7 EPs, and I think 5 & 7mm Nagles give a slightly better image, but I like the extra eye-relief of the Meades (14mm). However, my Radians EPs are better both in image quality & eye-relief, but then of course, they have a much smaller field of view.
|