|
Oh how I agree. And I think I know the problem..at least with the wotf theory..its the wrong word ..In general use it means something akin to notion or a casual thought..wellthats my view. Clearly the general public wont chsnge that approach so we would be taking a large step would it not be worthwhile for science to find a new wotd..one that mbodird our current meaning of theory..mm.let me think..preferred current paridim..current accepted observation.. Crude attempts but at least we would not get the..its only a theory thing. I have said its only a theory mydelf in my beginings about the big bang.. So I feel foolish but happy I am past that ppint.
Mmm Inteligent design. If I was not so on side with your vores I would play drvils advocate or rather advocate of the inteligent designer to rev you up I would love to vent more than you I bet. Still lets leave it where it is ..umfortunatelyits out thete. Its lurking around our schools and I bet it is sectetly taught in some of our schools at this very time.
That is a worry. I have talked in person to one of these folk anf he id up to this point intelligent..then ID I cant argue..never argue against belief ypu cant win with fact or proof and that is all you must focus upon.
Your post was so very intetesting and the sort of thing I feel will be of benefit to thosr who have an interest in science but..like me once go off half cocked with refutations that ..its only a theory.
Most enjoyable thank you for taking your time to contribute. Regarfs alex
|