Quote:
Originally Posted by Renato1
Unfortunately, I don't think that you are quite right.
Murdoch owns a small number of newspapers, which a huge number of readers want to read
|
Wrong - Murdoch own 142 different mastheads across the country. hardly a small number.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Renato1
Fairfax owns a small number of newspapers, which used to be huge, but which now make a loss most days of the week,
|
You mean like The Australian which hasn't made a profit for many, many years but is kept on as a political propaganda vehicle?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Renato1
and will not employ a conservative columnist
|
You've clearly missed Paul Sheehan and Chris Berg for starters.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Renato1
Stokes controls Channel Seven, Rhinehart is a shareholder in but does not run Channel 10
|
Lachlan Murdoch runs (or up until recently ran) Channel 10. He is of course Rupert Murdoch's son.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Renato1
West Australian News isn't run by any of the above.
|
Wrong - it is part of the Seven West Media group run by Kerry Stokes.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Renato1
Why it is ridiculous and hilarious is because such readers would have been aware many of those inconvenient citations from the IPCC 5th Assessment report
|
You mean a cherry-picked bunch of out-of-context canards deliberately selected to give a one-sided view of the AR5 in order to maintain the company's ongoing misrepresentation of science?
Sorry but your reasoning is both hilarious and convoluted and in no way refutes the report.
As for Bob Carter he's a geologist who shills for the fossil-fuel industry and has perpetrated what amounts to scientific fraud:
http://www.climateshifts.org/?p=4968
If you believe him over actual climate-scientists then you really have disappeared down the rabbit hole and no amount of reasoning will convince you of the facts. I see in your response you are steadfastly refusing to accept the peer-reviewed scientific paper cited by Andy despite pretending to be in favour of 'real science'.
