Quote:
Originally Posted by alistairsam
Thanks Paul, it sure does.
is it just the sheer amount of data that provides all the details to go from that to your result?
Do you sharpen in PS as well after the deconvolve in CCDStack?
Cheers
Alistair
|
Signal certainly helps to get the detail out but lots of signal and no noise allows a greater degree of sharpening. Too little data and the sharpening can take its toll.
I use deconvolution in CCDstack and then I do a series of sharpening masks in PS.
Quote:
Originally Posted by astronobob
Very impressive Paul. Had to check out CCDStack, quite some intellegent software and you have come to grips with it real well even tho it appears you do more processing in PS, that said, one needs particular attention as to what comes off CCDStack to go further, lacking data at this point would surely make dire straits if not done well for PS
Looking forward to the final, weather permitting  |
Yes each step of the processing requires careful viewing to make sure that I am not overstepping and adding noise. I tend to do this via what I think looks right and I don't work to a set regime. In this way each image tends to have its own unique look, which is good and bad I suppose.
There is still many things I am yet to learn about CCDstack. I intend to go through Adam Block's tutorials on it at some point and pick up some more.