View Single Post
  #7  
Old 25-05-2014, 03:54 PM
Astro_Bot's Avatar
Astro_Bot
Registered User

Astro_Bot is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 1,605
Well, nights of better seeing (as opposed to the Knights of Better Seeing - the name by which they were known before they were the Knights Who Say "Ni" ) are best for collimating. I guess the "twinkle" test is easiest to pick a good night - I'll try and find a link for some reading material. I use an artificial star for initial collimation (especially if I've cleaned the corrector, which I do when removed) then do fine adjustment with a bright star. Bob's Knobs definitely make it easier.

There are two schools of thought about whether to collimate with diagonal in place, given the diagonal can potentially be a source of problems. I've tried both and found no appreciable difference, but your mileage may vary.

As far as cooling/comparison goes: Paul Haese has a C14, which he adapted for Peltier cooling, and he should know more about the specifics of that scope than I do.

Edit. Here's an article about measuring seeing, though I admit I don't think it's as clear as it might have been:

Astronomical Seeing

There's a table half way down entitled, "ratings on the standard scale of seeing" that has the "twinkle" scale on the LHS.

Last edited by Astro_Bot; 25-05-2014 at 04:10 PM.
Reply With Quote