View Single Post
  #8  
Old 22-04-2014, 06:41 PM
mental4astro's Avatar
mental4astro (Alexander)
kids+wife+scopes=happyman

mental4astro is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: sydney, australia
Posts: 5,006
Your R and D question is a valid one Mark, only if you are accepting a naked mirror. But if you drop several thousand dollars on a large scope, like the 18" Skywatcher, and you look to recoat, you are in for a world of pain. And if you buy one second hand, and also look to recoat, you will get a very nasty surprise.

This is a significant problem. Conical mirrors are designed to be fixed onto the anchor points with epoxy resins. Great idea, but a terrible option for recoating. "Built in redundancy" gone mad here. I would never consider an 18" mirror as disposable. I wonder if this point was considered by the mirror producers?

On another point, it strikes me as funny that these conical mirrors are made to safe weight, and to a lesser extent faster cooling, but the new scopes using the mirrors also sport bloody big counter weights
Reply With Quote