Quote:
Originally Posted by alpal
99% - I don't think so - he's replacing false lumpy looking noise with
a more perfect even noise without losing the faint details of that galaxy.
|
He's replacing what came out of the camera with something artificial which didn't come out of the camera, that's really the issue for me.
In the example literally 99% of the image, the entire background, was replaced. In the final result the noise floor has been lowered, but no further details are present - implying that they don't exist, which is probably not true.
Anyway just my opinion, back to Mike's thread
