Quote:
Originally Posted by kinetic
Great discussion Ray,
further to your comment above,
I wonder if there is any merit in applying the deconvolution to the individual calibrated
subs rather than the raw stack result, pre stretch?
Steve
|
probably agree with Cam Steve - will have to give it some thought. what do you think?
Quote:
Originally Posted by LightningNZ
Good point Ray, thanks for mentioning that.
Steve - as long as no stretching is done during the stacking process then all that's going on is to average out the noise and signal in the original images so it should be okay.
Maybe instead of thinking of deconvolution as a sharpening process they should be thinking of it as a calibration process? That is really what it is provided the original signal is respected.
|
makes a lot of sense Cam - it is clearly a calibration process in that it corrects the data for deficiencies in the imaging process.
regards ray