View Single Post
  #11  
Old 03-03-2014, 08:53 AM
Wavytone
Registered User

Wavytone is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Killara, Sydney
Posts: 4,147
To be honest this was always the case, even when i was a kid - stores selling "telescopes" that were essentially junk. Some examples I recall:

- "refractors" with a singlet lens and eyepiece also consisting of 1 lens...

- refractors with a stop inside the tube effectively limiting the aperture to a third of the actual lens aperture, one way to control the various aberrations (whole also cutting most of the light);

- uncoated lenses,

- mounts so rickety they could barely support their own weight, never mind hold a telescope in position or find anything,

- reflectors with spherical mirrors,

- huygens/ramsden eyepieces, or a "symmetrical" if you were lucky (!)

- as below, scopes assembled with components way out of their correct orientation/collimation,

- "finders" that are hopelessly inadequate; you could do better sighting down the side;

- eyepiece focal lengths hopelessly mismatched to the scope - usually exceedingly high magnifications that were impossible to use,

- a well known telescope brand widely known as "Trashco" figured prominently...

etc etc etc...
Reply With Quote