Quote:
Originally Posted by Stevec35
A very good NGC 2997 there Ray. It's a deceptively tough galaxy.
Cheers
Steve
|
thanks very much Steve. it is a very pretty galaxy though - your image was great.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dvj
The grayscale is quite lovely. 
|
Thanks very much John.
Quote:
Originally Posted by strongmanmike
Ah, how was that done?
Yes RGB data can be crapolla and you can still get a good LRGB combine, as was the case with my recent NGC 2207 in Canis Major, after all, a common technique is to Gaussian blur the RGB before the LRGB combine anyway 
|
yes will give it a go
StarTools has a couple of ways to tidy up stars. Doesn't make up any new data, but just re-arranges it so that stars are closer to circular. I don't use it often, because it can look a bit artificial, but it can sometimes rescue otherwise valuable images.
Quote:
Originally Posted by multiweb
That looks really good Ray. 
|
Hi Marc - thanks
Quote:
Originally Posted by DavidNg
Hi Ray,
Love your image, lots of detail from core to galaxy arms.
I would like to see what will the color look like.
Regards
|
Thanks David, will do.
Quote:
Originally Posted by tilbrook@rbe.ne
Love it Ray!
How far off is your 10" ?
Can't wait to see what resolution you get from it.
Cheers,
Justin.
|
Thanks Justin. took the first coma-uncorrected image from the 10 inch last night - the Skywatcher optics are not quite as well corrected as the GSO, but should still be way more than good enough. I expect that the resolution will be the same as the 8 inch most of the time - determined entirely by the atmosphere. However, on those rare excellent nights, the 10 inch may do a little better - we shall see. The main advantage of the bigger scope is the CF tube, which should ease focusing problems a little and is definitely very rigid and stable - should do a better job of keep things in collimation.
regards Ray