View Single Post
  #17  
Old 01-02-2014, 09:51 PM
Peter Ward's Avatar
Peter Ward
Galaxy hitchhiking guide

Peter Ward is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: The Shire
Posts: 8,484
Quote:
Originally Posted by frolinmod View Post
Are you totally sure about that? If so then I guess I got lucky here. (And alas I'm never lucky at anything.) My PME which I purchased new directly from SB in August 2010 has 3 arc seconds peak to peak raw PE. It's sub arc second after programming PEC.

I had a GT-1100S before that which I purchased new directly from SB in 2000 and sold in 2010. It had a raw PE of 5 arc seconds peak to peak. In all the time I had it I never programmed the PEC and never really noticed the PE. All I ever did with that mount was planetary imaging at high focal lengths and C-14 Fastar imaging at low focal lengths. The only reason why I even knew it was 5 was because one of the potential purchasers asked me to measure it a few weeks before it finally sold.
You don't have to believe me... just look at a few older adverts.

That said, the current stated errors are the worst you can expect, and indeed, most SB mounts have decidedly better performance. (Mine runs at about +/- 2.5 arc sec )

Commercial realities are such, that you have to draw a line in the sand somewhere, eg give a PE specification, which is not a bad thing.... many manufacturers are reluctant to do even that.
Reply With Quote