Quote:
Originally Posted by avandonk
So you are asking questions of people who have not a clue about the RH200.
That should be informative.
If you have zero clue why did you not append your question to a far later image of mine, say yesterday.
I still call you a troll.
Bert
|
Well Bert, I go out of my way to compliment your skill, effort and patience in getting the scope to work and your response is to attack me. I don't get it.
>> So you are asking questions of people who have not a clue about the RH200.
I was asked to move the post to the equipment discussion section. I've done so. My hope is that someone from Officina Stellare will provide the design weight limits for the image train. Failing that, I'd hope that someone who is using the scope as a portable instrument will answer with details about their experience.
>> If you have zero clue why did you not append your question to a far later image of mine, say yesterday.
The reason I appended my question to this thread is that it contains discussion about the tip-tilt plate and possible flexure in that component of the system. I thought my post pertinent here but was asked to move it - I've done so.
Maybe you're so antagonistic because you feel I'm attacking you or the scope? I assure you I'm not. You've obviously got the flexure eliminated and moreover have done so with an intentionally heavy image train. The quality of your images speaks for itself - you've done a great job and the scope is obviously very high quality.
But... is it suitable for portable use where one of the goals is that has to be fairly easy to transport and setup. It's not clear to me if this is the case.
Dave