View Single Post
  #5  
Old 02-04-2006, 06:51 PM
Dave47tuc's Avatar
Dave47tuc (David)
IIS member 65

Dave47tuc is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Mornington peninsula. Victoria.
Posts: 1,658
Quote:
Originally Posted by janoskiss
Dave, are you reporting actual findings or is it all as you say "hypothetical"? How about with an f5 + paracorr
"hypothetical" but why test a eyepiece in a scope with a coma corrector, meaning fixing the scopes problem coma!
And in that. Is that the problem that people see on how the scope is and not the eyepiece

But I'm asking myself and have been for a long time ( I hope JB can help with this one )
People complain about there eyepieces in there scopes, but its seems to me its not the eyepiece its the scope
look I'm no expert on optics. But I'm just confused with so much talk on field curvature, what do people really see
A eyepiece problem or a telescope flaw

Please take note newbies and all I'm not talking about cheap eyepieces. I'm talking on eyepieces that are not suppose to have problems.
Just trying to get some informative talk on what i think is a over rated problem with eyepieces.
Reply With Quote