Quote:
Originally Posted by LuRuello
Comments welcome!
|
Your premise actually doesn't have much to do with Einstein's theories of relativity, other than the existence of black holes:
Special Relativity posited that the laws of physics are the same for all inertial reference frames, and that the speed of light in a vacuum is the same for all observers regardless of their reference frame.
General Relativity posited that space and time were unified (spacetime) and that mass/energy distorts spacetime which manifests as gravity.
Still, throwing "relativity" into a conversation and make yourself sound smart seems to be a popular passtime.
I once read
a novel (i.e. a work of fiction) that included a "theory" that fundamental particles spontaneously disappeared (via "rotation" through higher dimensions) and spontaneously appeared at a random locations in the universe - particle disappearance produced positive gravity proportional to mass while particle appearance produced negative gravity - the upshot being that since particle appearance was random, all the negative gravity cancelled out, and since particles disappeared where they were, positive gravity was created only where particles were, i.e. the more mass, the more gravity. This "theory" is totally wrong and contradicted by many real observations, but it's a simple idea that is far more straightforward than real physics, and at the time, it was a seductive idea.
Similarly, I'm wondering if perhaps you've been drawn in by some convenient fiction that makes "sense" of things beyond your understanding. Of course, I was only 12 years old at the time. What's your excuse?
(Oh, and unless this is a stupidly persistent piss-take, then you're batsh*t crazy. Just thought I'd mention it. Hey, I'm just sayin' what everyone's thinking).