Quote:
Originally Posted by jase
Thanks Mike. IC5332 is my pick of the two. I can't find many amateur images of this. Perhaps you can give it whirl. Interesting pick up on the star shapes. The flare around the stars don't agree with deconvolution which explains the odd shape. The raw subs are near perfect but a primary aperture mask would likely clean up the optical path further. There are a few other ways to address this with processing such as relayering the master as a star mask that is not passed through deconvolution which I may progress with in the next few images. Thanks for the feedback.
|
I
was going to shoot IC5332 actually but man, there are just sooo many cool galaxies to chose from this time of year
Hey I am not one to see a great image and
only comment on the star shapes
and to me they don't stop either image from being visually very appealing
I was only asking because I noticed them and was a little surprised, that's all
they look elongated virtically and slightly diamond shaped to me
Mike