View Single Post
  #18  
Old 05-11-2013, 05:19 PM
chiaroscuro's Avatar
chiaroscuro (Luke)
Registered User

chiaroscuro is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 144
Quote:
Originally Posted by Astro_Bot View Post
The polar scope can produce better results than that. When I used v3.35, my Mel and Maz were typically less than 10 arcminutes when using the polar scope, which is indeed quite good enough for visual or even short-exposure AP. But, true to say, for visual, you don't need to polar align.
I find it very difficult to see octans through the polar scope. I could blame it on its aperture, but I think its just me, although I can barely see anything through the polar scope.
I know its not really necessary to be so accurate for visual, but it seems like a fundamental skill for astronomy and for a smooth transition into astrophotography, if I ever take that daunting step. My next step is to learn how to drift align, now that I've got a reticle eyepiece.
Reply With Quote