View Single Post
  #11  
Old 19-10-2013, 11:58 PM
madbadgalaxyman's Avatar
madbadgalaxyman (Robert)
Registered User

madbadgalaxyman is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 936
Quote:
Originally Posted by mswhin63 View Post
Agreed this is the way to go, although we can't resolve the long wavelengths for radio astronomy at least we can carry out fast switching and phasing to do a more with the signal.
Hey Malcolm and Barry,

Thanks for your explanatory notes!

I am sure I am not alone amongst optical astronomers in finding radio astronomical equipment to be slightly confusing. Just making interferometric radio observations of a single object seems to me to be a difficult and extremely complex and very-time-consuming task, making even an imaging run with a Very Large Optical Telescope seem simple in comparison.

I also have trouble with intuitively conceptualizing frequency;

like most optical astronomers, I do have a real gut feeling for "so many nanometers" or "so many microns" in wavelength, but my mind starts to reel when people talk about GHz and MHz !

cheers,
Robert
Reply With Quote