View Single Post
  #10  
Old 10-10-2013, 12:58 AM
naskies's Avatar
naskies (Dave)
Registered User

naskies is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 1,865
Quote:
Originally Posted by Garbz View Post
This may get complicated from an algorithm point of view. I was intending to go down the route on >80% humidity switch on all dew heaters to a pre-set point.
Fair enough. I was mainly thinking that for optics, you want as little heating as possible - e.g. on my RC8 and manually controlled heaters, I get better FWHM numbers without heaters, provided that it doesn't dew up. However, I usually err on the side of too much heat / poorer FWHMs because it's less risky than losing a whole night's worth of subs.

Quote:
Why IR temp sensor? What advantage over the existing humidity and temperature sensor?
Cloud detection - i.e. use the IR sensor to read the sky temperature. If it's much lower than the ambient / ground temperature, then assume clear skies. Otherwise, if it's similar to the ambient temperature, there's a good chance of cloud. Perhaps something like this:

http://www.phidgets.com/products.php?product_id=1045_1

Now that I think of it... a precision light sensor might be handy too as a poor man's sky quality meter, i.e. record ambient light levels as part of the log data. I've noticed that the sky can vary a lot between consecutive nights at a dark site, so this would be handy to record.
Reply With Quote