View Single Post
  #11  
Old 11-08-2013, 10:23 PM
DJT (David)
Registered User

DJT is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,459
Quote:
Originally Posted by LewisM View Post
The VC200L is a brilliant scope. I have had 3 now, and only ever sold them to get another refractor. Now I find the lust for a 200L AGAIN! Nil mirror shift, superb optics, and a real galaxy slayer. Downside - HUGE diffraction spikes thanks to the VERY thick spider vanes (at least the secondary doesn't move!!!), but those can be milled down to reduce them, and, like all these kind of scopes, collimation is a chore if WAY out (but simple if only a touch out). Several techniques exist to fix this issue.
Hi Lewis. I looked around at some great images from the Vixen but the defraction spikes are going to be an issue for me I think. They look loke great scopes though.

Quote:
Originally Posted by gregbradley View Post

I imaged with a Tak BRC250 from an earlier house that was quite light polluted. It actually did pretty good with an Apogee U16M. I was surprised. That was HaLRGB imaging of things like the Tarantula Neb.

That BRC 250 in hindsight was a beautiful scope. Its F5.

Greg.
aaah...theres one on astromart..hmmmmm. Its fast enough and the FOV looks great. Reasonable fit for both the DSLR and a sony chipped camera by the looks of things at least for the targets I am interested in.tempting but need to do some more research first. The obvious question would be why you moved yours on?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Logieberra View Post
' ... what's the pain points between fixed and not fixed mirror ... '.
Thanks. I have been looking at the BAZ thread and will keep looking at that.
Reply With Quote