View Single Post
  #28  
Old 31-07-2013, 11:30 AM
mental4astro's Avatar
mental4astro (Alexander)
kids+wife+scopes=happyman

mental4astro is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: sydney, australia
Posts: 5,005
Thanks Andy. One person seems to understand my question.

Resolution may be lost (reducing aperture will do that), but again that's not a concern for me. It's not like I'm looking through a brick either. If I'm reducing my effective aperture from say 100mm down to 70mm, I'm still getting the wider field I'm after, and a 70mm aperture is still mighty fine for the application I'm after.

I hope I'm making myself clear here now.

Reducing effective aperture is no sin, and thankfully no physical harm either, . If you can't understand that, then that's a shame and I'll leave you to your sub 7mm exit pupils. The effect I'm after isn't predicated by adhering to a pucker tight definition of exit pupil. It IS dictated by pushing the FOV to as wide as possible. If there is a trade off in exit pupil, I'm happy to live with that. Now, can we get back to these blasted eyepieces...

Last edited by mental4astro; 31-07-2013 at 11:56 AM.
Reply With Quote