PDA

View Full Version here: : NGC 2070 - The Tarantula Nebula


SkyViking
01-11-2012, 08:42 AM
Hi everyone, here is a quick snap (~3.5 hrs) of the Tarantula that I was able to piece together from data gathered in the last days of October. I had to battle the increasing Moon light and also some relatively poor seeing, not the best conditions for imaging. Wind also caused some trailing of the stars, but with the limited amount of time I got through the clouds I couldn't throw away too many subs... :) The result turned out better than expected so here it is:

Link to large version (2MB) (http://www.rolfolsenastrophotography.com/Astrophotography/Nebulae/25312426_jC3jWq#!i=2186447495&k=RqVJMNK&lb=1&s=X3)
(Make sure to check out the large version, the attached preview is really too small)

Image details:
Date: 24th, 25th, 26th, 27th October 2012
Exposure: LRGB: 83:67:27:27m, total 3hrs 24mins @ -30C
Telescope: 10" Serrurier Truss Newtonian f/5
Camera: QSI 683wsg with Lodestar guider
Filters: Astrodon LRGB E-Series Gen 2
Taken from my observatory in Auckland, New Zealand

About the image:
The Tarantula Nebula, named for its appearance that somewhat resembles a giant spider in the sky, is the largest known emission nebula in the Local Group of galaxies. It is about 1000 light years wide and would appear incredibly bright if it were located in the place of the Orion Nebula. It is however located 160,000 light years away in the Large Magellanic Cloud, the largest of the dwarf galaxies that accompany our Milky Way.
In the very centre of the nebula lies R136, a super star cluster which is a very large region of star formation thought to be the precursor of a globular cluster. It is a very young cluster at only 1-2 million years and consists of giant and supergiant stars of which the majority are spectral type O3. The cluster also contains several Wolf-Rayet stars.
Speculation long sorrounded the nature of the central component of the cluster, named separately as R136a, and it was once thought to be a single hypergiant star of an incredible 1500 solar masses. R136a's true nature was recently resolved by holographic speckle interferometry and found to be a dense star cluster containing very massive and luminous stars. Three extremely luminous stars (R136a1, R136a2 and R136a3) dominate this cluster and are separated by only 0.10 and 0.48 arc seconds. R136a1 is the most massive star found to date with 265 solar masses, as well as being the most luminous at 10 million times the brightness of the Sun.
The entire R136 super cluster produces most of the energy that makes the Tarantula Nebula visible. The estimated mass of the cluster is 450,000 solar masses, suggesting it will probably become a globular cluster in the future.
A super star cluster, named Westerlund 1, also exists in the Milky Way but is heavily obscured by galactic dust.
The Hubble Space Telescope has produced a spectacular close-up of R136 (http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/a6/R136_HST_2009-12-15.jpg).

Hope you enjoy it, comments and critique welcome as always.

Regards,
Rolf

Stevec35
01-11-2012, 09:20 AM
Given the poor conditions you had Rolf that doesn't look too bad. I would probably boost the contrast a bit but that's just a personal preference as I like the Tarantula very contrasty.

Cheers

Steve

Larryp
01-11-2012, 09:59 AM
Looks great to me, Rolf!

dvj
01-11-2012, 01:29 PM
Your telescopes produces tack sharp stars. First thing I look at in an image. The colors are positvely electric on my display. Well done.

strongmanmike
01-11-2012, 04:14 PM
Ah, sigh...seeing, moon, wind and clouds ain't it always the way?.. then there's the light pollution...bring on arm chair astronmomy...:lol:

Lovely result Rolf, displayed at Large and 2XL size it looks bloody great awesome colours, yeh a bit saturated but still awesome :thumbsup:

It is missing the fine detail I expect to see in a Tarantula shot :question: but I think that is mostly from the lack of a Ha channel..? Plus I am sure the conditions didn't help and I hear you re being reluctant to chuck hard earned data :rolleyes:.

Still, very nice work, for a quicky! ;)

Mike

Ross G
05-11-2012, 10:12 PM
A great photo Rolf.

Sharp and detailed.

Ross.

TrevorW
08-11-2012, 03:24 PM
Nice effort Rolf

stardust steve
08-11-2012, 04:45 PM
love it Rolf. Beaut star color:thumbsup:
I liked how your image made it easy to identify certain objects from my image and made me say to myself " so that's what it looks like " :lol:

SkyViking
26-11-2012, 05:54 AM
Thanks Steve :), yes it does have a somewhat less contrasty look when there are no Ha exposures in it.


Thank you Laurie :)


Thank you John, yes I wanted to really bring out the colours of both the nebula and the sorrounding stars., I'm glad you liked it. :)


Thanks Mike :) The seeing was shocking that night so it's definitely not a high resolution image, lol. I couldn't waste a clear night though, that would have been unthinkable :P
Maybe I should get a Ha filter, there are still a couple of empty slots in my filterwheel. :question:


Thank you Ross, I'm glad you enjoyed it :)


Thanks Trevor :)


Thanks Steve, I like my images to show star colour. :)
There are so many objects packed in this small region of sky so I had to nab it, despite the poor conditions. ;):P