iceman
09-05-2006, 11:15 AM
Hi all
Andrew (astro_south) sent me 2 avi's from his magnificent first ToUcam effort (http://www.iceinspace.com.au/forum/showthread.php?t=9717).
They were only 1 pass, 60-odd and 30-odd frames respectively. Such incredible detail in such a short avi. The seeing was really good, focus is spot on.
What was the shutter speed?
Advice:
- More exposure! The raw frames are very dark. Try running with more gain and around 40-50% gamma, and a longer shutter speed (1/25s).
- Use k3ccdtools and have the exposure meter up above 200.
- More frames! You've done well on that 1 pass, but repeat the procedure on more passes (within about a 2 minute period). You can use virtual dub to combine all the avi's into a single one.
My reprocess isn't that much better than your original - you've done a great job already. I've found that my processing routine helps bring out more detail in average seeing, but in very good seeing (like you had), even minimal processing can show a great deal. Just look at Dennis with his "wavelet 1 =40" processing routine :eyepop:
My processing was my usual split RGB processing routine.
Anyway, an incredible job Andrew. But I do feel sorry for you - such good data and very good seeing on your very first attempt.. it's going to be very frustrating when you have endless nights of poor seeing :)
Thanks for letting me play with your data.
Andrew (astro_south) sent me 2 avi's from his magnificent first ToUcam effort (http://www.iceinspace.com.au/forum/showthread.php?t=9717).
They were only 1 pass, 60-odd and 30-odd frames respectively. Such incredible detail in such a short avi. The seeing was really good, focus is spot on.
What was the shutter speed?
Advice:
- More exposure! The raw frames are very dark. Try running with more gain and around 40-50% gamma, and a longer shutter speed (1/25s).
- Use k3ccdtools and have the exposure meter up above 200.
- More frames! You've done well on that 1 pass, but repeat the procedure on more passes (within about a 2 minute period). You can use virtual dub to combine all the avi's into a single one.
My reprocess isn't that much better than your original - you've done a great job already. I've found that my processing routine helps bring out more detail in average seeing, but in very good seeing (like you had), even minimal processing can show a great deal. Just look at Dennis with his "wavelet 1 =40" processing routine :eyepop:
My processing was my usual split RGB processing routine.
Anyway, an incredible job Andrew. But I do feel sorry for you - such good data and very good seeing on your very first attempt.. it's going to be very frustrating when you have endless nights of poor seeing :)
Thanks for letting me play with your data.