johnnyb
13-05-2011, 10:35 PM
Hi All :hi:,
I joined the forum a few weeks ago and have been reading lots (thanks to everyone!!), but I'm only just getting around to posting because I have some questions :)
I bought a 2nd hand Celestron Astromaster 130 from the classifieds here, plus a couple of eyepieces. I didn't want to spend too much to start with as I don't have a lot of time (I have 3 young kids), but I thought this scope would be good enough to let me know if I want to get serious, and if not I won't have spent a bucket load of money. We've had very few clear skies since I've had it, but the few nights I've taken it out I've had a few sucesses and a few frustrations.
The successes were a great view of the moon (over the last couple of nights), and a great view of the jewel box (both of which impressed the wife as well).
The main frustation I'm having is actually viewing the star that I want through the eyepiece:( When I first got it I only had a 10mm eyepiece (which gives me 65x magnification as the scope has a 650mm focal length). The scope has a built-on "finderscope", which is a little zero magnification thing with two red LED spots in its centre that you are meant to align when you look though it. I've tried to align this during the day (by centering something through the scope on a distant hill and adjusting the finderscope), but then at night when I look through the finderscope and center it on a star the star is nowhere to be seen through the eyepiece. It just seems to have too much parallax error when trying to line up the two red spots, and the red dots are too bright to see "through" them to the star you are trying to centre. I actually found the jewel box by randomly moving the scope around while looking through the eyepiece, which obviously isn't going to cut it in general.
I don't know if it's me (maybe I just need to spend some more time with it, and try aligning it again during the day) or whether the finerscope is crappy. I don't really know how to use it I guess - should I have my eye up close to the finderscope, or should I be a long way back from it??? If it is crappy is there an alternative. I see lots of posts refering to a Telrad - is that what I need? I bought a cheap 25mm eyepiece as I thought that would let me see enough of the sky to find what I want, but the few times I've tried it even that seems to provide too much magnification and I still can't see what I thought I centered in the finderscope. Maybe I need a 40mm eyepiece!
Part of the difficulty may be the equatorial mount, but I actually quite like it, even if it is a "bit" awkward to get it pointing where you want it to sometimes, and the eyepiece can be difficult to get to. (The way the equatorial mount moves makes me feel like I'm part of the universe :D, which is why I like it).
I haven't yet tried to properly align the mount so that I could use the RA and DEC circles to find a star. I thought that would tackle that after I had a bit more play time :), so I don't think that's the solution (but I may be wrong).
So any suggestion/tips are more than welcome.
Thanks (and sorry about such a long rant for my first post).
John.
I joined the forum a few weeks ago and have been reading lots (thanks to everyone!!), but I'm only just getting around to posting because I have some questions :)
I bought a 2nd hand Celestron Astromaster 130 from the classifieds here, plus a couple of eyepieces. I didn't want to spend too much to start with as I don't have a lot of time (I have 3 young kids), but I thought this scope would be good enough to let me know if I want to get serious, and if not I won't have spent a bucket load of money. We've had very few clear skies since I've had it, but the few nights I've taken it out I've had a few sucesses and a few frustrations.
The successes were a great view of the moon (over the last couple of nights), and a great view of the jewel box (both of which impressed the wife as well).
The main frustation I'm having is actually viewing the star that I want through the eyepiece:( When I first got it I only had a 10mm eyepiece (which gives me 65x magnification as the scope has a 650mm focal length). The scope has a built-on "finderscope", which is a little zero magnification thing with two red LED spots in its centre that you are meant to align when you look though it. I've tried to align this during the day (by centering something through the scope on a distant hill and adjusting the finderscope), but then at night when I look through the finderscope and center it on a star the star is nowhere to be seen through the eyepiece. It just seems to have too much parallax error when trying to line up the two red spots, and the red dots are too bright to see "through" them to the star you are trying to centre. I actually found the jewel box by randomly moving the scope around while looking through the eyepiece, which obviously isn't going to cut it in general.
I don't know if it's me (maybe I just need to spend some more time with it, and try aligning it again during the day) or whether the finerscope is crappy. I don't really know how to use it I guess - should I have my eye up close to the finderscope, or should I be a long way back from it??? If it is crappy is there an alternative. I see lots of posts refering to a Telrad - is that what I need? I bought a cheap 25mm eyepiece as I thought that would let me see enough of the sky to find what I want, but the few times I've tried it even that seems to provide too much magnification and I still can't see what I thought I centered in the finderscope. Maybe I need a 40mm eyepiece!
Part of the difficulty may be the equatorial mount, but I actually quite like it, even if it is a "bit" awkward to get it pointing where you want it to sometimes, and the eyepiece can be difficult to get to. (The way the equatorial mount moves makes me feel like I'm part of the universe :D, which is why I like it).
I haven't yet tried to properly align the mount so that I could use the RA and DEC circles to find a star. I thought that would tackle that after I had a bit more play time :), so I don't think that's the solution (but I may be wrong).
So any suggestion/tips are more than welcome.
Thanks (and sorry about such a long rant for my first post).
John.