PDA

View Full Version here: : A rather amazing new gadget - for the phone


Omaroo
05-05-2011, 03:31 PM
Whilst I have my 5D Mark II for the more serious still and movie photography, the one thing that I'm always guaranteed to have with me is my phone. Always.

So, given that the iPhone 4's not a bad camera at a pinch, it's also not a bad camcorder at 720 HD. Maybe not as good as a dedicated camcorder or camera with a larger (read: normal) CCD or CMOS sensor, but for a phone it's pretty danged nifty nonetheless.

The really bad thing about using your phone to capture video or take still photos is that it has no inertia. It's too light to hold steadily, so there is always an inherent shake in your footage. You've heard the great old excuse "Sorry it's a bit shaky, I took it on my phone!" many times before. The other main problem is that the ultra small lens that camera phones use pre-zooms so as to narrow your field of view to the point where it's not bad at distance, but not really crash-hot when videoing your friends' face when they're standing next to you.

The microphone is also designed to capture your voice when holding it as you do a phone to your face - hardly great when the action you're trying to record is in out there in front of you.

So....... enter the "OWLE Bubo". OWLE is an acronym of the company name, and a "bubo" is a variety of horned owl. Strange name for a device like this but true. I think it looks more like Robin's Batarang! It takes your iPhone 3/3GS or 4 and later iPods - and you order your unit based on what you want to use. It comes with a silicone case that provides an incredibly safe harbour for your phone when pushed into the unit - it's very safe indeed.

The Bubo is milled from solid billet aluminium so has real weight to it - the phone, lens and Bubo weigh a combined 698 grammes - about the weight of your average DSLR and kit lens. Still way less than a 5D and 24-105L, but that thing's a tank!

The lens is a standard camcorder lens (37mm) combo 0.45X wide angle and macro. It splits to give you either. You can also get a kit that allows you to attach full Canon and Nikon SLR lenses, but you're also able to use any sstandard 37mm camcorder lens - including telephoto. There is a Korean fellow who is shooting a full feature film with this already - just because he can. Have a look at some of the footage at: http://www.almlive.com/wantowle/

The object of the exercise is to provide a phone mount that has enough inertia in it to stop the shake, and to be able to mount extras on the phone such as lights, tripods, filters, directional boom mikes, dollies etc, etc. Some of you will be thinking "what a waste of time - just use a camera!". Well, yes, of course you can. What a camera can't do is what an iPhone 4 can: take, edit and send a finished video in the field and all from the one unit - right there and then.

I can see journos using similar devices to this soon - and plenty in the US already use the Bubo/iPhone 4 combo when they could otherwise lug around a full-sized rig.

This one arrived at my place from the States (in 3 days) just now - and already I reckon that it'll be lots of fun. There are numerous apps out there such as "1stVideo" and "almostDSLR" that let you capture still and video, edit your footage and add audio and then upload to a server directly or send to email, Vimeo or YouTube all in one stroke. How good is that for field work when time is critical and you have to get a report in? The almostDSLR app lets you set and lock exposure levels, white balance and focus - something that you've never been able to do until now on a 5MP mobile phone camera. 1st Video is quite a comprehensive video editing package designed specifically for mobile journalism. You can use iMovie if you like as well.

Lots of fun coming up with this I think. :thumbsup: Just for the record - I'm not affiliated with this company in any way shape or form.

Apple's specs for the iPhone 4:

Omaroo
05-05-2011, 04:34 PM
Here are a couple of close-up shots of a section of the printed brochure. The focusing system had difficulty with this because of the rosette pattern of colour that a CMYK print process entails - giving autofocus routines a workout.

The first is using the standard camera lens without any help - and the second, taken with the macro lens on, is rather self explanatory.

dugnsuz
05-05-2011, 10:10 PM
Love this kind of stuff Chris - 3rd party add ons!!
Nice find

dugnsuz
05-05-2011, 10:12 PM
ps...found this recently on the hunt for DSLR video stability

http://www.spiderbrace.com/index.html

The Spiderbrace 2 with the centre handle is perfect for DSLR shooting

Doug

Omaroo
05-05-2011, 10:33 PM
That'd be fantastic for the 5D when shooting video Doug - a great find there too. :thumbsup:

Omaroo
05-05-2011, 10:39 PM
Here's the iPhone /Bubo fitted with some "proper" lenses.

Here's a video of them in use on the iPhone. Pretty decent results I think.

http://vimeo.com/13634931

dugnsuz
05-05-2011, 10:42 PM
Jeez Chris - hardware heaven!!
That last pic looks very stressed!

Omaroo
05-05-2011, 10:57 PM
Don't know Doug - it's solid billet, so it's incredibly strong. There's nowhere for it to flex at all. They reckon that they tested one in a press, and it broke at 40 tonnes of applied pressure.

Octane
05-05-2011, 11:18 PM
That's not a light lens, either!

Very cool, Chris. :D

H

dugnsuz
05-05-2011, 11:21 PM
Isn't it a joy when one buys sh#t that just works!?

iceman
06-05-2011, 07:33 AM
Wow, very cool!

Barrykgerdes
06-05-2011, 08:23 AM
Its a bit of a novelty but what happens if someone rings while you are in the middle of a photography session. A dedicated camera and a separate phone will always be the most practical.

Barry

Omaroo
06-05-2011, 08:50 AM
LOL Barry... :)

You put the phone into "Airplane" mode first, which temporarily defeats all comms.

Practical - depends what for! I'm yet to see how my 5D Mk II can edit video right there and then at the scene, and subsequently upload complete material over 3 or 4G directly to YouTube, Vimeo, my server or my newsdesk before I even make it back to the office. It's designed for field journalism, which is where it's excelling in the US, and that's what I'm experimenting with. In that regard it leaves traditional cameras for dead. I realise that you can upload material from your DSLR to a laptop via 802.11 and process it that way - but then you have start carrying equipment and bags around. A bit difficult when you're competing for news stories. This definitely has its niche, and it's a legitimate one.

Jeffkop
06-05-2011, 09:24 AM
Looks like a great idea ... Success is guaranteed .. no mention of price though. From this post I think THAT is the only limitation of the device for the multitudes if in fact it is.

In my situation however, I could walk from here to Sydney with the movie quicker than I could send anything using my Iphone. The data rate borders on useless, but I have seen friends that have I phones and they appear to be much faster.

Omaroo
06-05-2011, 09:28 AM
I think that you're right Jeff - the type of phone and network it's on (obviously) makes a difference. I'm on Telstra, which from all accounts so far outperforms the others by a fair margin in terms of 3G throughput. Ask Humayun... :)

I took a 30 second movie yesterday, edited it and added titles plus a voiceover and it took about 5 minutes to upload to YouTube over 3G. That's a whole interview for television news.

Price paid for this one was $230 landed in Australia by Fedex Priority - which was US$61 of that. If a distributor took them on here in Australia and bought them with Aussie dollars I'd say it'd probably be sitting on shelves here at about the AU$160 mark.

Image: Just uploaded a 30-second 720HD video (32Mb) to YouTube via 3G and it took bang-on 5 minutes. You can't even get back to your car in that time.