BlackWidow
16-12-2010, 10:24 PM
I know that I am going to get people telling me not to use a De-rotator and get a wedge. I am getting a wedge as well but anm wanting to try some things with the De-Rotator. I have seen some good sites with very good results with De-Rotators and most comments are based on opinions rather than from usage. Bit like opals being bad luck I guess...
Anyway this is my question... I have seen and read about people using PHD Guiding in Alt Az to guide an LX200. I understand that no matter how good the guiding, in time rotation will still be a problem in the shot. Hence the idea of using my De-Rotator to fix the rotation. At first I thought I would use a WebCam in and off axis guider at the back of the Field De-Rotator to guide the Corrected non rotating image. Hmmm
Could I assume that a better idea would be to use PHD guiding on a guide scope attached to my LX200 using a WebCam as the software was intended to be able to do. Then still use the De-Rotator at the back of the LX200 with another Long Exposure WebCam or my 300d SLR to do the long exposure. The De-Rotator will then in effect remove or reduce the rotation of the guided shot.
I just would like somone who has played with this sort of thing to explain if my logic is logical. I know some are going to want me to explain why I would bother with this process?? Well I just want to know and have a go at it. I am in the process of having a good wedge made as the retail ones are over priced and under designed. I will then use the wedge for more detailed and longer exposures. I have a very small property and have to set up each time I use the scope so I don't want to use the wedge option all the time. I have tried to contact some of the websites that have use De-Rotation but have not had any replys at this stage.]
Somtimes doing the hard things make the easy ones a piece of cake ( I know I might be kidding myself, buts that's OK isn't it?)
Seeing No Stars at the Moment
Mardy
Anyway this is my question... I have seen and read about people using PHD Guiding in Alt Az to guide an LX200. I understand that no matter how good the guiding, in time rotation will still be a problem in the shot. Hence the idea of using my De-Rotator to fix the rotation. At first I thought I would use a WebCam in and off axis guider at the back of the Field De-Rotator to guide the Corrected non rotating image. Hmmm
Could I assume that a better idea would be to use PHD guiding on a guide scope attached to my LX200 using a WebCam as the software was intended to be able to do. Then still use the De-Rotator at the back of the LX200 with another Long Exposure WebCam or my 300d SLR to do the long exposure. The De-Rotator will then in effect remove or reduce the rotation of the guided shot.
I just would like somone who has played with this sort of thing to explain if my logic is logical. I know some are going to want me to explain why I would bother with this process?? Well I just want to know and have a go at it. I am in the process of having a good wedge made as the retail ones are over priced and under designed. I will then use the wedge for more detailed and longer exposures. I have a very small property and have to set up each time I use the scope so I don't want to use the wedge option all the time. I have tried to contact some of the websites that have use De-Rotation but have not had any replys at this stage.]
Somtimes doing the hard things make the easy ones a piece of cake ( I know I might be kidding myself, buts that's OK isn't it?)
Seeing No Stars at the Moment
Mardy